Behr v. Campbell, Case No. 18-12842 (11th Cir. 2021).
The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine is narrow and applies only when a losing state court litigant calls on a district court to modify or “overturn an injurious state-court judgment”; district courts do not lose subject matter jurisdiction over a claim “simply because a party attempts to litigate in federal court a matter previously litigated in state court.”
Maas v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Case No. 2D20-253 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021).
A borrower altering an original promissory note in open court by striking through her signature is a not a clear contemptuous act and is not direct criminal contempt.
Perez v. Jaimot,Case No. 3D21-1302 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).
An order of partition isfinal at such time as the court directs the sale of the property.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Electronic Funds Transfer Corporation D/B/A The EFT Network, Inc.,Case No. 5D20-655 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021).
A party seeking to impose punitive damages on a business entity based on the actions of a managing agent must prove the agent was more than a middle-level manager or that he was a middle-level manager with more than limited managerial authority.