Wheaton v. Wheaton, Case No. SC17-716
Proposals for settlement madepursuant to Florida Statutes section 768.79and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure1.442 do not need to comply with the email service provisions of Florida Rule of JudicialAdministration 2.516.
Craryv. Tri-Par Estates Park and Recreation District, Case No. 2D17-3540 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).
An over-55 community association, which is also an independent special taxing district created by the Florida Legislature, does not have the authority toenact (or enforce) rules and regulations promulgated by the association’s board of trustees governing the use ofits facilities if the district’s enabling legislation did not provide for the power to enact such rules.
Shands v. City of Marathon, Case No. 3D17-1859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).
In an as-applied inverse condemnation case, the awarding of Rate Of Growth Ordinance
(ROGO) points may be sufficient to avoid a finding that zoning and environmental regulations deprived the property owner of all or substantially alleconomic use of their property.
KIS Group, LLC v. Moquin, Case No. 4D18-1435 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).
A trialcourt’s denial of defendant’s motion for summary judgment on a fraud claim is not the functional equivalent of a determination that a sufficient factual basis exists under Florida Statute section 768.72 for plaintiff to claim of punitive damages.